Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 4.662
Filtrar
1.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0303152, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38722995

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Short peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) failure is a common complication that is generally underdiagnosed. Some studies have evaluated the factors associated with these complications, but the impact of care complexity individual factors and nurse staffing levels on PIVC failure is still to be assessed. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and risk factors of PIVC failure in the public hospital system of the Southern Barcelona Metropolitan Area. METHODS: A retrospective multicentre observational cohort study of hospitalised adult patients was conducted in two public hospitals in Barcelona from 1st January 2016 to 31st December 2017. All adult patients admitted to the hospitalisation ward were included until the day of discharge. Patients were classified according to presence or absence of PIVC failure. The main outcomes were nurse staffing coverage (ATIC patient classification system) and 27-care complexity individual factors. Data were obtained from electronic health records in 2022. RESULTS: Of the 44,661 patients with a PIVC, catheter failure was recorded in 2,624 (5.9%) patients (2,577 [5.8%] phlebitis and 55 [0.1%] extravasation). PIVC failure was more frequent in female patients (42%), admitted to medical wards, unscheduled admissions, longer catheter dwell time (median 7.3 vs 2.2 days) and those with lower levels of nurse staffing coverage (mean 60.2 vs 71.5). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the female gender, medical ward admission, catheter dwell time, haemodynamic instability, uncontrolled pain, communication disorders, a high risk of haemorrhage, mental impairments, and a lack of caregiver support were independent factors associated with PIVC failure. Moreover, higher nurse staffing were a protective factor against PIVC failure (AUC, 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72-0.74). CONCLUSION: About 6% of patients presented PIVC failure during hospitalisation. Several complexity factors were associated with PIVC failure and lower nurse staffing levels were identified in patients with PIVC failure. Institutions should consider that prior identification of care complexity individual factors and nurse staffing coverage could be associated with a reduced risk of PIVC failure.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Periférico , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto , Admisión y Programación de Personal , Falla de Equipo/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , España/epidemiología
2.
J Infus Nurs ; 47(3): 155-162, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38744240

RESUMEN

This study aims to analyze the incidences of peripheral intravenous catheter-related phlebitis and infiltration and the associated risk factors in emergency departments. This descriptive cross-sectional, nonexperimental study was conducted with 300 participants in the emergency department of a university hospital in Türkiye between January 15 and February 15, 2018. The incidence of peripheral intravenous catheter-related phlebitis was 31%, which was grade 1 in 29.7% and grade 2 in 1.3% of the emergency department participants. Additionally, the incidence of peripheral intravenous catheter-related infiltration was 55.4%, including grades 1, 2, and 3 in 36.0%, 12.7%, and 6.7% of the participants, respectively. Incidences of phlebitis and infiltration were related to age, duration of peripheral intravenous catheterization longer than 24 hours, and repeated use of the catheter insertion site. The findings of this study may draw attention to the factors that trigger phlebitis and infiltration due to peripheral intravenous catheter insertions in the emergency department and may guide practices to prevent these complications before they develop. In this context, the Phlebitis Scale and Infiltration Scale developed by the Infusion Nurses Society are recommended to be used in the emergency department.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Periférico , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Flebitis , Humanos , Flebitis/etiología , Flebitis/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Factores de Riesgo , Incidencia , Anciano , Turquía , Hospitales Universitarios
3.
J Infus Nurs ; 47(3): 190-199, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38744244

RESUMEN

This study aimed to compare patients' experience of pain during ultrasound (US)-guided peripheral venipuncture versus conventional peripheral venipuncture. This randomized clinical trial was conducted at a public university hospital in 2021. Adult patients with indication for intravenous therapy compatible with peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) were included: intervention group (IG), US peripheral venipuncture executed by specialist nurses; control group (CG), conventional peripheral venipuncture executed by clinical practice nurses. The primary outcome was patient experience of pain during the procedure and patient experience related to the PIVC placement method. Sixty-four patients were included, 32 for each group. The pain experienced was none-to-mild in the IG for 25 patients (78.1%) and moderate-to-severe in the CG for 21 patients (65.7%; P < .001). The overall pain rating was 2 (1-3) in the IG and 4 (3-6) in the CG (P < .001). The recommendation of the procedure in IG (net promoter score [NPS] + 90.6%) versus CG (NPS + 18.8%) was considered excellent and good, respectively (P < .001). Patients had less pain and significantly recommended the US-guided procedure. Patient experience with US-guided PIVC, performed by a specialist nurse, was superior to that of conventional peripheral venipuncture.


Asunto(s)
Flebotomía , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Flebotomía/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Adulto , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor/prevención & control , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Anciano
4.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0295347, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38739611

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: When clinicians need to administer a vasopressor infusion, they are faced with the choice of administration via either peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) or central venous catheter (CVC). Vasopressor infusions have traditionally been administered via central venous catheters (CVC) rather than Peripheral Intra Venous Catheters (PIVC), primarily due to concerns of extravasation and resultant tissue injury. This practice is not guided by contemporary randomised controlled trial (RCT) evidence. Observational data suggests safety of vasopressor infusion via PIVC. To address this evidence gap, we have designed the "Vasopressors Infused via Peripheral or Central Access" (VIPCA) RCT. METHODS: The VIPCA trial is a single-centre, feasibility, parallel-group RCT. Eligible critically ill patients requiring a vasopressor infusion will be identified by emergency department (ED) or intensive care unit (ICU) staff and randomised to receive vasopressor infusion via either PIVC or CVC. Primary outcome is feasibility, a composite of recruitment rate, proportion of eligible patients randomised, protocol fidelity, retention and missing data. Primary clinical outcome is days alive and out of hospital up to day-30. Secondary outcomes will include safety and other clinical outcomes, and process and cost measures. Specific aspects of safety related to vasopressor infusions such as extravasation, leakage, device failure, tissue injury and infection will be assessed. DISCUSSION: VIPCA is a feasibility RCT whose outcomes will inform the feasibility and design of a multicentre Phase-3 trial comparing routes of vasopressor delivery. The exploratory economic analysis will provide input data for the full health economic analysis which will accompany any future Phase-3 RCT.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Periférico , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Enfermedad Crítica , Estudios de Factibilidad , Vasoconstrictores , Humanos , Vasoconstrictores/administración & dosificación , Vasoconstrictores/uso terapéutico , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Adulto , Infusiones Intravenosas , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
5.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0300425, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38709807

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Deep Venous Thrombosis (DVT) due to Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) is one of the most threatening complications after device insertion. OBJECTIVE: To assess the rate of PICC-associated DVT and analyze the risk factors associated with this event in cancer and critically ill patients. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive, retrospective cohort study with 11,588 PICCs from December 2014 to December 2019. Patients ≥ 18 years receiving a PICC were included. Pre-and post-puncture variables were collected and a logistic regression was used to identify the independent factors associated with the risk of DVT. RESULTS: The DVT prevalence was 1.8% (n = 213). The median length of PICC use was 15.3 days. The median age was 75 years (18; 107) and 52% were men, 53.5% were critically ill and 29.1% oncological patients. The most common indications for PICC's were intravenous antibiotics (79.1%). Notably, 91.5% of PICC showed a catheter-to-vein ratio of no more than 33%. The tip location method with intracavitary electrocardiogram was used in 43%. Most catheters (67.9%) were electively removed at the end of intravenous therapy. After adjusting for cancer profile ou chemotherapy, regression anaysis revealed that age (OR 1.011; 95% CI 1.002-1.020), previous DVT (OR 1.96; 95% CI 1.12-3.44) and obstruction of the device (OR 1.60; 95% CI 1.05-2.42) were independent factors associated with PICC-associated DVT, whereas the use of an anticoagulant regimen was a protective variable (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.54-0.99). CONCLUSION: PICC is a safe and suitable intravenous device for medium and long-term therapy, with low rates of DVT even in a cohort of critically ill and cancer patients.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Periférico , Trombosis de la Vena , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trombosis de la Vena/etiología , Trombosis de la Vena/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Brasil/epidemiología , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Crítica , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Prevalencia
6.
Perfusion ; 39(1_suppl): 23S-38S, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38651584

RESUMEN

Limb ischaemia is a clinically relevant complication of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) with femoral artery cannulation. No selective distal perfusion or other advanced techniques were used in the past to maintain adequate distal limb perfusion. A more recent trend is the shift from the reactive or emergency management to the pro-active or prophylactic placement of a distal perfusion cannula to avoid or reduce limb ischaemia-related complications. Multiple alternative cannulation techniques to the distal perfusion cannula have been developed to maintain distal limb perfusion, including end-to-side grafting, external or endovascular femoro-femoral bypass, retrograde limb perfusion (e.g., via the posterior tibial, dorsalis pedis or anterior tibial artery), and, more recently, use of a bidirectional cannula. Venous congestion has also been recognized as a potential contributing factor to limb ischaemia development and specific techniques have been described with facilitated venous drainage or bilateral cannulation being the most recent, to reduce or avoid venous stasis as a contributor to impaired limb perfusion. Advances in monitoring techniques, such as near-infrared spectroscopy and duplex ultrasound analysis, have been applied to improve decision-making regarding both the monitoring and management of limb ischaemia. This narrative review describes the evolution of techniques used for distal limb perfusion during peripheral VA ECMO.


Asunto(s)
Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Arteria Femoral , Humanos , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Perfusión/métodos , Cateterismo/métodos , Isquemia/prevención & control , Isquemia/etiología , Adulto , Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Extremidades/irrigación sanguínea
7.
Br J Nurs ; 33(7): S28-S34, 2024 Apr 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38578937

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: First-insertion success rates for peripheral vascular access devices (PVADs) in patients with difficult venous access (DIVA) are low, which negatively affects staff workload, patient experience, and organizational cost. There is mixed evidence regarding the impact of a peripheral vascular access device with retractable coiled tip guidewire (GW; AccuCath™, BD) on the first-insertion success rate. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the use of long GW-PVADs, compared with standard PVADs, reduces the risk of first-time insertion failure, in patients admitted to emergency departments (EDs). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A parallel-group, two-arm, randomized controlled trial will be carried out in two Australian EDs to compare long GW-PVADs (5.8 cm length) against standard care PVADs (short or long). Patients ≥18 years of age meeting DIVA criteria will be eligible for the trial. The sample size is 203 participants for each arm. Web-based central randomization will be used to ensure allocation concealment. Neither clinicians nor patients can be blinded to treatment allocation. Primary outcome is the first-insertion success rate. Secondary outcomes include the number of insertion attempts, time to insert PVAD, all-cause failure, dwell-time, patient-reported pain, serious adverse events, complications, subsequent vascular access devices required, patient satisfaction, staff satisfaction, and healthcare costs. Differences between the two groups will be analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression. Cost-effectiveness analysis will also be conducted. Intention-to-treat analysis will be used. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study is approved by Metro South Ethics Committee (HREC/2022/QMS/82264) and Griffith University (2022/077). The findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12622000299707.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Periférico , Hospitalización , Humanos , Administración Intravenosa , Australia , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Catéteres , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años
10.
Crit Care Sci ; 36: e20240235en, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés, Portugués | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38597484

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Newborn infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit require arterial cannulation for hemodynamic monitoring and blood sampling. Arterial access is achieved through catheterization of umbilical or peripheral arteries. Peripheral artery cannulation is performed in critically ill newborns, but artery localization and cannulation is often challenging and unsuccessful. Therefore, increasing the internal diameter and preventing vasospasm are important for successful peripheral artery cannulation in neonates. Topical glyceryl trinitrate has the potential to increase cannulation success by relaxing arterial smooth muscles and thus increasing the internal diameter. We aim to conduct a pilot randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of topycal glyceryl trinitrate in increasing the diameter of the radial artery in neonates. METHODS/DESIGN: This study will be a single-center, observer-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted in the neonatal intensive care unit of Perth Children's Hospital, Western Australia. A total of 60 infants born at >34 weeks of gestation who are admitted for elective surgery or medical reasons and for whom a peripheral arterial line is needed for sampling or blood pressure monitoring will be recruited after informed parental consent is obtained. The primary outcome will be the change in radial arterial diameter from baseline to postintervention. Secondary outcomes will be the absolute and percentage change from baseline in the radial arterial diameter in both limbs and safety (hypotension and methemoglobinemia). DISCUSSION: This will be the first randomized controlled trial evaluating the use of topical glyceryl trinitrate to facilitate peripheral artery cannulation in neonates. If our pilot randomized controlled trial confirms the benefits of glyceryl trinitrate patches, it will pave the way for large multicenter randomized controlled trials in this field.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Periférico , Nitroglicerina , Lactante , Niño , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Nitroglicerina/uso terapéutico , Arteria Radial , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Australia Occidental , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto
11.
Br J Nurs ; 33(7): S18-S26, 2024 Apr 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38578942

RESUMEN

Occasionally, the administration of intravenous (IV) therapies can go wrong. Infiltration or extravasation is a complication when a drug or IV therapy leaks into the tissues surrounding the vascular access device. Extravasation can cause serious and often life-changing injuries. Extravasation is often associated with systemic anti-cancer therapy but non-chemotherapy drugs have been reported as having a greater risk of serious complications. This study outlines the first UK Infusion unit evaluation of the ivWatch infusion monitoring device which was undertaken from August 2023 to January 2024. Out of 2254 infusions monitored with ivWatch, the device prevented 122 cases of infiltration and extravasation from causing any harm to the patient, corresponding to a 5.4% 'check IV' notification rate.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Periférico , Atención de Enfermería , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Extravasación de Materiales Terapéuticos y Diagnósticos , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos
12.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 17(8): 979-988, 2024 Apr 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38658126

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) at high risk for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) sustain comparable improvements in health status over 5 years after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or SAVR. Whether a similar long-term benefit is observed among intermediate-risk AS patients is unknown. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess health status outcomes through 5 years in intermediate risk patients treated with a self-expanding TAVR prosthesis or SAVR using data from the SURTAVI (Surgical Replacement and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) trial. METHODS: Intermediate-risk patients randomized to transfemoral TAVR or SAVR in the SURTAVI trial had disease-specific health status assessed at baseline, 30 days, and annually to 5 years using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). Health status was compared between groups using fixed effects repeated measures modelling. RESULTS: Of the 1,584 patients (TAVR, n = 805; SAVR, n = 779) included in the analysis, health status improved more rapidly after TAVR compared with SAVR. However, by 1 year, both groups experienced large health status benefits (mean change in KCCQ-Overall Summary Score (KCCQ-OS) from baseline: TAVR: 20.5 ± 22.4; SAVR: 20.5 ± 22.2). This benefit was sustained, albeit modestly attenuated, at 5 years (mean change in KCCQ-OS from baseline: TAVR: 15.4 ± 25.1; SAVR: 14.3 ± 24.2). There were no significant differences in health status between the cohorts at 1 year or beyond. Similar findings were observed in the KCCQ subscales, although a substantial attenuation of benefit was noted in the physical limitation subscale over time in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: In intermediate-risk AS patients, both transfemoral TAVR and SAVR resulted in comparable and durable health status benefits to 5 years. Further research is necessary to elucidate the mechanisms for the small decline in health status noted at 5 years compared with 1 year in both groups. (Safety and Efficacy Study of the Medtronic CoreValve® System in the Treatment of Severe, Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis in Intermediate Risk Subjects Who Need Aortic Valve Replacement [SURTAVI]; NCT01586910).


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Válvula Aórtica , Arteria Femoral , Estado de Salud , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Calidad de Vida , Recuperación de la Función , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Humanos , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Femenino , Masculino , Factores de Tiempo , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/efectos adversos , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/instrumentación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Factores de Riesgo , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Medición de Riesgo , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/instrumentación , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Punciones , Diseño de Prótesis
13.
Innovations (Phila) ; 19(2): 161-168, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38504184

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Lower-limb ischemia is a complication of minimally invasive cardiac surgery with femoral cannulation. Herein, we verified our strategy using distal perfusion cannulation (DPC) against this complication. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed 91 cases of aortic valve replacement with femoral cannulation between January 2019 and March 2023. DPC was applied when lower-limb tissue oxygenation index declined by ≥20%. The cannula to femoral artery diameter ratio (C/FA) was calculated by dividing the cannula size (Fr) divided by 3 by the femoral artery inner diameter (mm). Postoperative maximum creatinine kinase (CKmax), lactate dehydrogenase (LDHmax), and lactate levels were analyzed, and univariable logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were employed to determine DPC predictors and the cutoff C/FA for DPC, respectively. Patients without DPC were divided into 2 subgroups based on the cutoff C/FA for further comparisons. RESULTS: DPC was required in 9 patients. Symptomatic ischemia was not observed. All laboratory data were similar in the DPC and non-DPC groups. C/FA was significantly associated with DPC (odds ratio = 1.27, 95% confidence interval: 1.09 to 1.47, P = 0.002), and the cutoff C/FA was 0.70 (sensitivity = 0.89, specificity = 0.80). In the non-DPC group, CKmax (P = 0.027) and LDHmax (P = 0.041) were significantly higher in patients with C/FA ≥0.7 (n = 16) than in those with C/FA <0.7 (n = 66). CONCLUSIONS: Our strategy for preventing symptomatic ischemia is reasonable and could be almost achieved without DPC when C/FA is <0.7. C/FA also predicts asymptomatic potential ischemia, and proactive DPC is preferable when C/FA is ≥0.7.


Asunto(s)
Arteria Femoral , Isquemia , Extremidad Inferior , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Isquemia/etiología , Isquemia/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/efectos adversos , Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Extremidad Inferior/cirugía , Cánula/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos
14.
Child Care Health Dev ; 50(2): e13250, 2024 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38529773

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Obtaining peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) access in children with severe neurological impairment (SNI) is often challenging and commonly associated with complications, including dislodgement, phlebitis and extravasation. In severe cases, extravasation injury may lead to tissue necrosis, ulceration and long-term morbidity. The aim of this study was to determine the relative incidence of PIVC complications secondary to lower limb cannulation, compared to upper limb, in children with SNI. METHODS: A single centre, retrospective, observational review was conducted. Patients with SNI, admitted at a tertiary paediatric centre over 6 months between July and December 2022, were included. RESULTS: One-hundred fifty-five PIVC procedures were conducted in 110 children over the study period. Complications were more common in lower limb PIVCs (12/16, 75%) compared to upper limb (58/139, 42%), p = 0.01. CONCLUSION: Upper limb cannulation is preferred in children with SNI.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Periférico , Niño , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Extremidad Superior , Hospitalización , Incidencia
15.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(12): e37184, 2024 Mar 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38518044

RESUMEN

To investigate the incidence, risk factors, and pathogenic characteristics of catheter-related bloodstream infection caused by peripherally inserted central venous catheter in neonates, and to provide references for reducing the infection rate of peripherally inserted central venous catheter. The clinical data of 680 neonates who underwent peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) in the neonatal intensive care unit from June 2020 to June 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The risk factors and independent risk factors of catheter-related bloodstream infection caused by PICC were determined by univariate and multivariate analysis, respectively. Catheter-related bloodstream infection occurred in 38 of 680 neonates who underwent PICC. The infection rate was 4.74%. The proportions of fungi, gram-positive bacteria, and gram-negative bacteria were 42.11%, 36.84%, and 21.05%, respectively. Candida parapsilosis was the main fungus (18.42%), coagulase negative Staphylococcus was the main gram-positive bacteria (23.68%), and Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli were the main gram-negative bacteria (7.89%). Univariate analysis showed that gestational age ≤32 weeks, birth weight ≤1500 g, congenital diseases, nutritional support, catheterization time, 5-minute APGAR score ≤7, and neonatal respiratory distress syndrome were associated with catheter-related bloodstream infection caused by PICC. Multivariate analysis showed that premature delivery, low birth weight, parenteral nutrition, long catheterization time, and 5-minute APGAR score ≤7 were associated with catheter-related bloodstream infection caused by PICC. Among the pathogens detected, there were 6 cases of K pneumoniae, 5 cases of coagulase negative staphylococci, and 2 cases of fungi. Low birth weight, premature delivery, off-site nutrition, long catheterization time, and 5-minute APGAR score ≤7 are independent risk factors for catheter-related bloodstream infection in neonates with peripherally inserted central venous catheters. The pathogenic bacteria are fungi and multidrug-resistant bacteria.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres , Cateterismo Venoso Central , Cateterismo Periférico , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Sepsis , Recién Nacido , Humanos , Lactante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Coagulasa , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/microbiología , Sepsis/etiología , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos
16.
Expert Rev Med Devices ; 21(3): 207-216, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38445649

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: More than 30% of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and midline catheters experience complications. Most complications are related to thrombotic cellular adherence to catheter materials. AREAS COVERED: This manuscript outlines PICC and midline catheter complications, the need to reduce complications and how hydrogel catheters may provide a solution to address these unmet needs based on available evidence. EXPERT OPINION: Patients commonly require PICC or midline catheters for treatment to establish a reliable form of intravenous access. Catheters, while reliable in most cases, are not without complications, including occlusion, thrombosis and infection, each related to cellular adherence to the catheter material. Hydrophilic catheter coatings and composites have been developed to mitigate these thrombotic complications, reduce adherence of blood and bacterial cells to catheters and provide greater patient safety with these devices. Hydrogel materials are highly biocompatible and have been effective in reducing cellular adherence and the formation of biofilms on surfaces. Smooth hydrophilic catheter surfaces are potentially more comfortable for the patient, with reduced friction during insertion and removal. A catheter constructed of hydrophilic biomaterial, a hydrogel composite material, may minimize thrombotic complications in PICC and midline catheters, improving catheter performance and outcomes for patients.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres , Cateterismo Venoso Central , Cateterismo Periférico , Trombosis , Humanos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/microbiología , Hidrogeles , Catéteres , Trombosis/etiología , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos
17.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 103(5): 722-730, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38469945

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The radial first approach in cardiac catheterization is preferred for its benefits in patient comfort and recovery time. Yet, challenges persist due to characteristics like small, deep, calcified, and mobile radial arteries. Utilizing ultrasound before and during procedures can improve success rates. However, the adoption of its use is still limited and subject to debate. AIM: To utilize routine preprocedural ultrasound (US) and compare US guided with palpation guided radial access, focusing on operator efficiency and outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consenting adult patients undergoing elective radial cardiac catheterization were divided into palpation and US groups. Routine preprocedural assessment of radial artery characteristics was performed using handheld US. Baseline data, US findings, procedural outcomes, and clinical outcomes were compared in 182 participants (91 in each group). US guided radial access had significantly higher first pass success rates (76.92% vs. 49.45%, p 0.0001), fewer number of attempts (1.46 ± 1 vs. 1.99 ± 1.46, p 0.004), and shorter amount of time (93.62 ± 44.04 vs. 120.44 ± 67.1, p 0.002) compared with palpation guidance. The palpation group had significantly higher incidence of spasm (15.38% vs. 3.3%, p 0.0052). Subgroup analysis indicated consistent benefits of US guidance, especially in calcified radial arteries. CONCLUSION: This prospective, nonrandomized, single-center study demonstrated that real-time procedural US improved the operator's time and effort and enhanced patient comfort compared with palpation. US guidance use was particularly favorable in the presence of calcifications observed on baseline preoperative US.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Periférico , Adulto , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Palpación/métodos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Arteria Radial/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Radial/cirugía , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos
18.
Support Care Cancer ; 32(4): 239, 2024 Mar 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38512390

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To identify the trends in the prevalence of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) related complications in cancer patients and explore the risk factors for complications and occurrence speed. METHODS: A total of 3573 cancer patients with PICC were recruited at 17 hospitals from 2016 to 2022. Logistic and COX regression were performed to identify influencing factors of PICC-related complications and incidence speed, respectively. RESULTS: The proportion of symptomatic PICC-related thrombosis, phlebitis, and infections reported had decreased from 59.1% (in 2017), 11.9% (in 2016), and 11.1% (in 2016) to 15.3% (in 2022), 2.9% (in 2022), and 7.4% (in 2022), and adhesive-related skin injuries and bleeding/oozing reported had increased from 4.8% (in 2016) and 0.0% (in 2016) to 45.5% (in 2022) and 3.4% (in 2022), respectively. Catheter occlusion showed a trend of first increasing and then decreasing from 2.4 (in 2016) to 12.0 (in 2020) to 5.8% (in 2022). Logistic regression showed that hospital level, nature, the patient's gender, age, diagnosis, history of deep vein catheterization, chemotherapy drug administration, and type of PICC were influencing factors of complications. COX regression showed that the patient's gender, age, diagnosis, history of deep vein thrombosis and thrombophlebitis, history of deep vein catheterization, chemotherapy drug administration, type of PICC, type of connector, and StatLock used for fixation were influencing factors of incidence speed. CONCLUSION: The composition ratios of PICC-related complications in cancer patients in China have changed in recent years. Chemotherapy drug administration was a significant risk factor accelerating the occurrence of complications. Maintenance factors had the maximum weight on the COX model, followed by patient factors. It is suggested that patients with high-risk factors be closely monitored and proper maintenance be performed to prevent and delay the occurrence of PICC-related complications.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres , Cateterismo Venoso Central , Cateterismo Periférico , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Neoplasias , Humanos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Prevalencia , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores de Riesgo , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/etiología
19.
PLoS One ; 19(3): e0299692, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38512885

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyze the prevalence, risk factors, and clinical implications of hemolyzed laboratory samples in the pediatric emergency department (ED), a subject on which existing data remains scarce. METHODS: We conducted a multi-site observational cohort analysis of pediatric ED encounters in Metro Detroit, Michigan, United States. The study included participants below 18 years of age who had undergone peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) placement and laboratory testing. The primary outcome was the presence of hemolysis, and secondary outcomes included identifying risk factors for hemolysis and assessing the impact of hemolysis on PIVC failure. RESULTS: Between January 2021 and May 2022, 10,462 ED encounters met inclusion criteria, of which 14.0% showed laboratory evidence of hemolysis. The highest proportion of hemolysis occurred in the infant (age 0-1) population (20.1%). Multivariable regression analysis indicated higher odds of hemolysis for PIVCs placed in the hand/wrist in the toddler (age 2-5) and child (age 6-11) subgroups. PIVCs placed in the hand/wrist also demonstrated higher odds of failure in infants. CONCLUSIONS: Hemolysis in the pediatric ED population is a frequent complication that occurs at similar rates as in adults. PIVCs placed in the hand/wrist were associated with higher odds of hemolysis compared to those placed in the antecubital fossa. Clinicians should consider alternative locations for PIVC placement if clinically appropriate. Further research is needed to better understand the clinical implications of pediatric hemolysis.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Periférico , Hemólisis , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo
20.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 43(4): 703-712, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38326546

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Elderly patients admitted to geriatrics departments often require peripheral venous catheters (PVC), which should be inserted and maintained following a series of preventive recommendations. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of a training bundle comprising measures aimed at reducing complications associated with the use of PVC in elderly patients admitted to a tertiary teaching hospital. METHODS: We performed a prospective study of patients who received a PVC within 24 h of admission to a geriatrics department. After a 10-month pre-interventional period, we implemented an educational and interventional bundle over a 9-month period. Follow-up was until catheter withdrawal. We analyzed and compared clinical and microbiological data between both study periods. RESULTS: A total of 344 patients (475 PVC) were included (pre-intervention period, 204 patients (285 PVC); post-intervention period, 140 patients (190 PVC)). No statistically significant differences in demographic characteristics were observed between the study periods. The colonization and phlebitis rates per 1000 admissions in both periods were, respectively, 36.7 vs. 24.3 (p = 0.198) and 81.5 vs. 65.1 (p = 0.457). The main reason for catheter withdrawal was obstruction/malfunctioning (33.3%). Obstruction rate was higher for those inserted in the hand than for those inserted at other sites (55.7% vs. 44.3%, p = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: We found no statistically significant differences regarding phlebitis and catheter tip colonization rates. It is necessary to carry out randomized studies assessing the most cost-effective measure to reduce complications associated with PVC.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Periférico , Flebitis , Humanos , Anciano , Estudios Prospectivos , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Catéteres/efectos adversos , Flebitis/etiología , Flebitis/prevención & control , Pacientes
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA